Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 18:32:09 -0500 (EST) From: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> To: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu> Cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Any ideas why we can't even boot a i386 ? Message-ID: <XFMail.20030227183209.jhb@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <p05200f29ba84405d006d@[128.113.24.47]>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 27-Feb-2003 Garance A Drosihn wrote: >>I doubt the usefulness of this. i386 kernels were just accidentally >>broken for almost a month and a half without anyone noticing. >>People wouldn't have noticed if phk@ hadn't asked for a volunteer >>either. I386_CPU kernel compiles have been broken in the past for >>rather long periods of time before being noticed as well. > > Well, doesn't that suggest that it would be GOOD if the release > process itself had to build a GENERIC_I386 kernel? It points out that no one uses I386 kernels. Is it more valuable to have GENERIC_I386 or KDE on disc 1? If it came down to that I would pick KDE. -- John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.20030227183209.jhb>