Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 18:53:57 -0800 From: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net> To: Andreas Klemm <andreas@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Cyrille Lefevre <clefevre@citeweb.net>, "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org>, ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: PORTVERSION=6.1 wrong in linux_base-62 ??? Message-ID: <20011116185357.B528@athlon.pn.xcllnt.net> In-Reply-To: <20011116133037.GA5439@titan.klemm.gtn.com> References: <20011115123424.B36113@kayak.xcllnt.net> <200111160336.fAG3abG13456@gits.dyndns.org> <20011115211037.B721@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> <20011116062954.GB3852@titan.klemm.gtn.com> <20011115230006.B1610@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> <20011116133037.GA5439@titan.klemm.gtn.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 02:30:37PM +0100, Andreas Klemm wrote: > > I ask myself, what the technical problem is ... > > Does a newer "ld" or other tool from linux_base-7 need the > libraries in another format which would explain, why I had > no success in overwriting /usr/compat with linux_base 6.1, 6.2 > and 7 in that order ??? I can't answer the question, because I don't know. The reason I don't know is because I don't really care. I had hoped that linux_base-7 could be installed on top of linux_base-6, but apparently it doesn't. This is Red Hat brokenness AFAICT, and as I said before, I'm not really anxious to solve problems Red Hat didn't bother to solve themselves. > Do we need to create linux binaries ourselves instead of using > packages from RedHAt, to get a really good working emulator ... ??? For example. Using a different distribution might also make a difference. I choose Red Hat because it had the best overall support. Chances were that if something run on Linux, it run on Red Hat. -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011116185357.B528>