Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2001 13:46:30 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org> To: Bill Fenner <fenner@research.att.com> Cc: drosih@rpi.edu, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: macro recommendation (Was ...) Message-ID: <200109051946.f85JkUh47254@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 05 Sep 2001 11:15:10 PDT." <200109051815.LAA15714@windsor.research.att.com> References: <200109051815.LAA15714@windsor.research.att.com> <200109041705.f84H5W692572@earth.backplane.com> <20010904122843.A56085@xor.obsecurity.org> <20010904233320.A34429@nagual.pp.ru> <20010904123718.A56317@xor.obsecurity.org> <20010904234757.A34576@nagual.pp.ru> <20010904125125.A56758@xor.obsecurity.org> <20010904140449.B75606@dragon.nuxi.com> <200109042122.f84LMcm95136@earth.backplane.com> <20010904145320.A76317@dragon.nuxi.com> <200109042205.f84M5YM95627@earth.backplane.com> <20010905085206.B95963@dragon.nuxi.com> <p0510100db7bc0a81c3f1@[128.113.24.47]>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <200109051815.LAA15714@windsor.research.att.com> Bill Fenner writes: : Is there any real reason to have the SCCS IDs, given that they're : derivable from the CVS IDs? The SCCS IDs are from a different name sequence than the CVS IDs. It may be good to have them in the source, but they don't need to be in the .o's. Or is that whay you are saying? Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200109051946.f85JkUh47254>