Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 23:55:26 +0100 From: "Paul B. Mahol" <onemda@gmail.com> To: Jung-uk Kim <jkim@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] amd64 suspend/resume code to be comitted Message-ID: <3a142e750903251555q77f3cab2nf95628f3bfbec842@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200903251823.40899.jkim@FreeBSD.org> References: <200903111233.14029.jkim@FreeBSD.org> <3a142e750903251422x3c19207by5c817bfa9d872b85@mail.gmail.com> <200903251823.40899.jkim@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 3/25/09, Jung-uk Kim <jkim@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Wednesday 25 March 2009 05:22 pm, Paul B. Mahol wrote: >> On 3/11/09, Jung-uk Kim <jkim@freebsd.org> wrote: >> > With popular demands, I will commit the following patch in next >> > few days unless a showstopper is found or "over-my-dead-body" >> > type of review is received. ;-) >> > >> > http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/amd64_suspend-20090311.diff >> > >> > FYI, it was originally posted here: >> > >> > http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200810211228.31028.jkim >> > >> > and here: >> > >> > http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200812102120.03788.jkim >> > >> > Please read the original threads for more information about the >> > patch. >> >> Looks some of your changes makes i386 without ACPI (acpi is >> disabled; not loaded and hint.acpi.0.disabled=1) fail to reboot. >> >> It this already known/documented behavior? > > Huh? No, it is totally unexpected because I didn't touch non-ACPI > path for i386. Can you back out r189903, r190339, r190340 and test > again? I dont think/believe it is actually your change after all. -- Paul
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3a142e750903251555q77f3cab2nf95628f3bfbec842>