Date: Wed, 13 May 1998 01:11:05 -0700 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> To: Petri Helenius <pete@sms.fi> Cc: Guido van Rooij <guido@gvr.org>, peter@netplex.com.au (Peter Wemm), dag-erli@ifi.uio.no, net@FreeBSD.ORG, core@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: INRIA IPv6 on FreeBSD Message-ID: <6974.895047065@time.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 13 May 1998 03:06:13 %2B0300." <13656.58219.715765.24138@silver.sms.fi>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I've been using the INRIA stuff for >6 months now and I'm happy with > that with the exception of the pain I've to go through when I need to > match -stable patches to the INRIA code which gets up-ported only > every now and then. Great, great, now go run the WIDE stuff and tell us how it compares! :-) Seriously, that's the problem here. We don't need advocates who have tried only ONE implementation comprehensively - we can find plenty of such folks already and they don't help us at all in making a decision about which implementation to back. :-( - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6974.895047065>