Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 22:00:54 +0200 From: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org> To: Martin Cracauer <cracauer@cons.org> Cc: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Update for www/amd64/motherboards.sgml - please review Message-ID: <1124136054.37769.18.camel@ikaros.oook.cz> In-Reply-To: <20050815155810.A95917@cons.org> References: <20050815154552.A95576@cons.org> <1124135653.37769.16.camel@ikaros.oook.cz> <20050815155810.A95917@cons.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-PB7fJe9TTaYrwk+1HHS3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Martin Cracauer p=ED=B9e v po 15. 08. 2005 v 15:58 -0400: > Pav Lucistnik wrote on Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 09:54:13PM +0200:=20 > > Martin Cracauer p=EDse v po 15. 08. 2005 v 15:45 -0400: > > > Can somebody who has the SGML system running and is a native speaker > > > of English please review the appended diff? > > >=20 > > > It contains entries for the 4 mainboards that I tried with > > > FreeBSD/AMD64 recently. > >=20 > > I'm the lord of motherboard page... > >=20 > > Could you please make the Notes fields a little less verbose, and drop > > all strictly non-technical stuff? Check=20 > > http://www.freebsd.org/platforms/amd64/motherboards.html > > for inspiration. No prices, no reviews, no feelings, just terse notes > > about what works with FreeBSD and what not. >=20 > I don't think that would be too useful. Things are a little more > complicated than just "works" or not. >=20 > I'll drop some of the pure impression stuff, lets see how we are doing > then.=20 Sure, that's what I had in mind. > > Also please wrap the lines at 72. Or I can fix the style once we're > > happy with the content. >=20 > OK, I was just following the style of the other entries. They should probably be fixed too. As I said, style can be fixed later. > > More notes: > > - Dual-core Opteron =3D=3D Opteron rev. E. >=20 > No, different things. All dual-cores are E steppings, but there are > single-core E stepping processors, too. Ah. No patch attached, BTW. --=20 Pav Lucistnik <pav@oook.cz> <pav@FreeBSD.org> And now something completely different. --=-PB7fJe9TTaYrwk+1HHS3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBDAPR2ntdYP8FOsoIRArAQAKC92+in3HS04zqCBdmw0nOy1mBsEgCfeG+4 SIjiDz+PZZ10AW88bdZQBGE= =7OgS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-PB7fJe9TTaYrwk+1HHS3--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1124136054.37769.18.camel>