Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 21:11:10 +0930 From: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> To: Stefan Bethke <stb@lassitu.de> Cc: freebsd-current Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: AppleTalk status Message-ID: <13F8E068-61AE-4670-86B8-B09C3BC00B86@gsoft.com.au> In-Reply-To: <7DB9656A-44DF-4A37-B9A4-652451234FEE@lassitu.de> References: <7DB9656A-44DF-4A37-B9A4-652451234FEE@lassitu.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 25/05/2010, at 20:55, Stefan Bethke wrote: > I'm working on updating net/netatalk to version 2.1 (or 2.1.1 when = that comes out the next couple of days), and I'm wondering what state = AppleTalk support is in these days. Is anybody still using it, or would = now be the time to make all AppleTalk support in that port optional, and = just focus on the file server component? >=20 > I haven't used AppleTalk for at least eight years now, and I don't = quite see which setting it still would be used in nowadays... I use it so I can back my Macbook Pro to my FreeBSD server on a ZFS = partition.. (But that is all) -- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?13F8E068-61AE-4670-86B8-B09C3BC00B86>