Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 13:59:43 -0400 (EDT) From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net> Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Runt frames = broken VLAN ? Message-ID: <200108281759.f7SHxh439282@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <20010828103536.D10481@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> References: <5.1.0.14.0.20010828010515.0221d380@192.168.0.12> <200108281654.f7SGsIF38299@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> <20010828103536.D10481@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<<On Tue, 28 Aug 2001 10:35:36 -0700, Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net> said: > But doesn't the switch have to assume that the VLAN will be attached to > some non-trunked ports, in which case the packets must be an appropriate > length. The minimum length needs to be enforced at the output interface. (A switch would need to do so anyway for locally-generated packets.) -GAWollman To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200108281759.f7SHxh439282>