Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 16:44:37 +0100 From: Tom Evans <tevans.uk@googlemail.com> To: Johannes Totz <johannes@jo-t.de> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ZFS and disk usage Message-ID: <CAFHbX1K2Fhs_xPyRMCXp0xqSXUadog3DVuoTVX3A1U_g69_Hpw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <jm9gkf$l16$1@dough.gmane.org> References: <4F8825E5.3040809@gmail.com> <1334323707.4f8829fbe801e@www.hyperdesktop.nl> <jm9gkf$l16$1@dough.gmane.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Johannes Totz <johannes@jo-t.de> wrote: > Small rant: I dont understand why zpool and zfs show different things. > If you have an integrated storage stack then why not show consistent > numbers? Is there any use for this extra (mis-)information that > zpool-vs-zfs provides? > They are supposed to be different things. `zpool list` shows the size of the raw storage in the pool, where as `zfs list` shows the size of file systems on that storage. zpool deals with raw storage blocks, why would it talk about the size of the overlying filesystem? Cheers Tomhome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAFHbX1K2Fhs_xPyRMCXp0xqSXUadog3DVuoTVX3A1U_g69_Hpw>