Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 16:44:37 +0100 From: Tom Evans <tevans.uk@googlemail.com> To: Johannes Totz <johannes@jo-t.de> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ZFS and disk usage Message-ID: <CAFHbX1K2Fhs_xPyRMCXp0xqSXUadog3DVuoTVX3A1U_g69_Hpw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <jm9gkf$l16$1@dough.gmane.org> References: <4F8825E5.3040809@gmail.com> <1334323707.4f8829fbe801e@www.hyperdesktop.nl> <jm9gkf$l16$1@dough.gmane.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Johannes Totz <johannes@jo-t.de> wrote: > Small rant: I dont understand why zpool and zfs show different things. > If you have an integrated storage stack then why not show consistent > numbers? Is there any use for this extra (mis-)information that > zpool-vs-zfs provides? > They are supposed to be different things. `zpool list` shows the size of the raw storage in the pool, where as `zfs list` shows the size of file systems on that storage. zpool deals with raw storage blocks, why would it talk about the size of the overlying filesystem? Cheers Tom
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAFHbX1K2Fhs_xPyRMCXp0xqSXUadog3DVuoTVX3A1U_g69_Hpw>