Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 08:48:55 +0100 From: Borja Marcos <borjam@sarenet.es> To: Mark Felder <feld@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Possible ZFS bug? Insufficient sanity checks Message-ID: <ABC8C997-F059-49CB-9B16-3778D3AF77EF@sarenet.es> In-Reply-To: <1392943920.2273.85942093.30069072@webmail.messagingengine.com> References: <BF2D310C-7B8F-413D-9D20-A887236C5913@sarenet.es> <1392943920.2273.85942093.30069072@webmail.messagingengine.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Feb 21, 2014, at 1:52 AM, Mark Felder wrote: > I'm curious: on both machines did the zpools share the same name? No, not at all. I'm waiting for a couple of SAS cables to repeat the = same test and verify that it's indeed what happened. What I think so far is, ZFS was happy to see that the physical disk was = the same one.=20 Borja.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ABC8C997-F059-49CB-9B16-3778D3AF77EF>