Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2009 22:37:23 +0100 (BST) From: Chris Hedley <freebsd-current@chrishedley.com> To: Gary Jennejohn <gary.jennejohn@freenet.de> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New builds won't boot (fwd) Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0907042227360.92691@teapot.cbhnet> In-Reply-To: <20090630175731.4c589f80@ernst.jennejohn.org> References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0906071604540.1724@teapot.cbhnet> <4A2C124A.1050707@freebsd.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0906261725570.1809@teapot.cbhnet> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0906261926080.1809@teapot.cbhnet> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0906300051400.33237@teapot.cbhnet> <3c1674c90906291830g1c79c80bq42ce99f44588e968@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0906300326290.1621@teapot.cbhnet> <20090630113544.3e2bef31@ernst.jennejohn.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0906301524240.12510@teapot.cbhnet> <20090630175731.4c589f80@ernst.jennejohn.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009, Gary Jennejohn wrote: > Ah, yes. Now that I think about it again, you're right. That's also > when I started seeing it. > > I'm now running mav's ata-cam patches and took ATA_STATIC_ID out of > my config file. I'd sort of forgotten when/why I'd done it. > > Sorry for the confusion. No problems, I may have a look at the ata-cam patch myself to see if that's any more successful. So thanks for the idea. :) On a completely different subject (and unrelated to the kind souls who have helped out), I'm a bit miffed to find these messages have been gated onto the web by freebsd.org, kerneltrap.org et al with complete, intact email addresses making them easily available to every spammer, 419er and other miscreant on the net. I was wondering why the amount of spam I was getting had tripled in the last fortnight. >:(
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.0907042227360.92691>