Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 22:58:48 +0100 From: "Steven Hartland" <killing@multiplay.co.uk> To: <lev@FreeBSD.org>, "Konstantin Belousov" <kostikbel@gmail.com> Cc: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net>, freebsd-current FreeBSD <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, Kirk McKusick <mckusick@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: UFS+J panics on HEAD Message-ID: <8D72700F5CA4461BAD1C98908689CB9E@multiplay.co.uk> References: <38A5BC8F-A8FB-4371-AB1D-9548F5957254@lists.zabbadoz.net><20120523131046.GC2358@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <12410676034.20120524013853@serebryakov.spb.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lev Serebryakov" <lev@FreeBSD.org>
> Or should we call FFS officially dead and promote ZFS as only usable
> FS on modern FreeBSD now?
Slightly OT but I must say I'm a big fan of ZFS since I first tried it under
FreeBSD a few years back.
Not only is it a dream to use as an admin, making all traditionally hard
tasks easy; its also helped us identify failing hardware which nothing
else has spotted.
While it might be a shame to see FFS go by the wayside are there any
big reasons why you would rather stick with FFS instead of moving
to ZFS with all the benefits that brings?
With regards protective panics I must agree, in this case it does seem
there are much better paths which could be chosen.
Regards
Steve
================================================
This e.mail is private and confidential between Multiplay (UK) Ltd. and the person or entity to whom it is addressed. In the event of misdirection, the recipient is prohibited from using, copying, printing or otherwise disseminating it or any information contained in it.
In the event of misdirection, illegible or incomplete transmission please telephone +44 845 868 1337
or return the E.mail to postmaster@multiplay.co.uk.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8D72700F5CA4461BAD1C98908689CB9E>