Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 21:34:37 +1300 From: Mark Kirkwood <markir@paradise.net.nz> To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org, Steven Hartland <killing@multiplay.co.uk>, Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net> Subject: Re: FreeBSD 7.1 BETA 2 vs Opensolaris vs Ubuntu performance Message-ID: <492D0A1D.9070602@paradise.net.nz> In-Reply-To: <d763ac660811250906q7be1e093yb2bf1ac6ecf52d3b@mail.gmail.com> References: <DE23C2B055DA4BC683BDCAA95FF7B736@multiplay.co.uk> <200811242107.mAOL7JB9058269@lava.sentex.ca> <d763ac660811250906q7be1e093yb2bf1ac6ecf52d3b@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Adrian Chadd wrote:
> 2% may not sound like a lot but it starts becoming measurable savings
> when the number of boxes involved is ${LARGE}.
>
> 2c,
>
>
Yeah, but the margin for error in these tests is undoubtedly > 2%.
AFAICS this benchmark shows that Freebsd is "up there" with these guys -
slower on some, faster on some - no problem.
regards
Mark
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?492D0A1D.9070602>