Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 01:23:57 -0600 (MDT) From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> To: jhb@FreeBSD.org Cc: net@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Code review Message-ID: <20080826.012357.1973601375.imp@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <200808251037.11126.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <20080825.002316.-1548243307.imp@bsdimp.com> <200808251037.11126.jhb@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <200808251037.11126.jhb@freebsd.org>
John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> writes:
: On Monday 25 August 2008 02:23:16 am M. Warner Losh wrote:
: > I did this a few years ago when trying to track down a problem with
: > some realtek network chips that I was having problems with at Timing
: > Solutions. I'd like to get this into the tree, since it was helpful
: > then.
: >
: > Comments?
:
: When you are running a faster tick I think want to only call the mii and
: watchdog stuff once a second still. I know this will break the tx watchdog
: for example. Since it's kind of tricky to manage that I think you should
: just use a separate timer for the twister stuff.
Is this in general, or do you have a specific problem in mind with the
rl change? In general, we're not transmitting during this exercise
and it happens only once... Is it worth the extra hair?
Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080826.012357.1973601375.imp>