Date: Thu, 27 Apr 1995 22:53:09 -0700 From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami | =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQHUbKEI=?= =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOCsbKEIgGyRCOC0bKEI=?=) To: nils@guru.ims.uni-stuttgart.de Cc: jmz@cabri.obs-besancon.fr, jkh@time.cdrom.com, jmacd@FreeBSD.org, ports@freefall.cdrom.com Subject: Re: g77 port Message-ID: <199504280553.WAA15318@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> In-Reply-To: <m0s4Uuk-0003VaC@guru.ims.uni-stuttgart.de> (nils@guru.ims.uni-stuttgart.de)
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* I know this, I don't like it either. But: both gnat and g77 are * integral parts of the gcc compiler and gcc's standard searchpath for * compiler backends is /usr/libexec. Hence I decided to put gnat1 and * f771 there or at least install a symlink there pointing to the real * places. Installing the ports in a separate hierarchy like /usr/local Oh, okay. I don't think there will be any problem if we add a tiny little symlink or two in /usr/libexec. I'll add it as part of the post-install target. Satoshi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199504280553.WAA15318>