Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 2 May 2005 10:22:03 -0400
From:      David Gilbert <dgilbert@dclg.ca>
To:        Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net>
Cc:        freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: 64bit CPUs
Message-ID:  <17014.14219.963494.753741@canoe.dclg.ca>
In-Reply-To: <6.2.1.2.0.20050501193659.05483bd0@64.7.153.2>
References:  <6.2.1.2.0.20050501094429.06974910@64.7.153.2> <42750861.8000509@mac.com> <6.2.1.2.0.20050501193659.05483bd0@64.7.153.2>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>>>> "Mike" == Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net> writes:

Mike> Thanks!  I was worried I was missing something obvious in all
Mike> the 64bit excitement.  For my apps where I cant balance across
Mike> multiple machines or where space is an issue, dual core CPUs I
Mike> think might be more interesting to look at in a few months.

Hi Mike!

Anyways, we've been finding that raw packet passing is significantly
better on some of the newer tyan opteron boards.  But then that may
have as much to do with them shipping with multiple independant PCI-X
slots than the opterons themselves.  Memory bandwidth probably doesn't
hurt, either.

Dave.

-- 
============================================================================
|David Gilbert, Independent Contractor.       | Two things can only be     |
|Mail:       dave@daveg.ca                    |  equal if and only if they |
|http://daveg.ca                              |   are precisely opposite.  |
=========================================================GLO================



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?17014.14219.963494.753741>