Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 17:25:19 +0200 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> To: lev@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Subject: Re: geom_fox vs geom_multipath? Message-ID: <CAF-QHFWCkyeEp%2BX483KEYCQZpX4zLngBPP0O=7giU9O_hn9wOg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <310097590.20110926191353@serebryakov.spb.ru> References: <1108033999.20110921224848@serebryakov.spb.ru> <20110922105105.GA1662@garage.freebsd.pl> <j5pun7$hb1$1@dough.gmane.org> <310097590.20110926191353@serebryakov.spb.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 26 September 2011 17:13, Lev Serebryakov <lev@freebsd.org> wrote: > Hello, Ivan. > You wrote 26 =D1=81=D0=B5=D0=BD=D1=82=D1=8F=D0=B1=D1=80=D1=8F 2011 =D0=B3= ., 17:29:11: > >>> The geom_fox class is more of an example GEOM class. >> Should it be disconnected from the build? I don't think it's ever used >> in practice... > =C2=A0And the same question is about geom_aes :) Yes, both are some of the earliest GEOM modules ever, they should be clearly marked as examples. Perhaps after HEAD gets unfrozen.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAF-QHFWCkyeEp%2BX483KEYCQZpX4zLngBPP0O=7giU9O_hn9wOg>