Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 11:33:18 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 'make includes' ownership patch Message-ID: <20010528113318.D32649@sunbay.com> In-Reply-To: <20010526150600.A77078@xor.obsecurity.org>; from kris@obsecurity.org on Sat, May 26, 2001 at 03:06:00PM -0700 References: <20010526145922.A72087@xor.obsecurity.org> <20010526150600.A77078@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 03:06:00PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 02:59:22PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > Shouldn't the includes/Makefile be installing headers using > > INCOWN/INCGRP instead of BINOWN/BINGRP? I ran into this when trying > > to do a 'make includes' as a normal user. > > Oops, hit send too soon; more changes are required of the same form. > Before I go to the trouble of doing those, I might as well get > confirmation whether this is the right thing to do. > This was on my TODO. The only problem with INCOWN/INCGRP not being used here is that they were introduced long after include/Makefile. Cheers, -- Ruslan Ermilov Oracle Developer/DBA, ru@sunbay.com Sunbay Software AG, ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer, +380.652.512.251 Simferopol, Ukraine http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve http://www.oracle.com Enabling The Information Age To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010528113318.D32649>