Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 21:11:21 -0700 From: David Wolfskill <david@catwhisker.org> To: Jared Barneck <rhyous@yahoo.com> Cc: advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Seeking list of "commercial companies that still have large scale FreeBSD deployment" Message-ID: <20100916041121.GZ1415@albert.catwhisker.org> In-Reply-To: <326921.55992.qm@web52108.mail.re2.yahoo.com> References: <20100915234643.GT1415@albert.catwhisker.org> <687881.42385.qm@web52102.mail.re2.yahoo.com> <326921.55992.qm@web52108.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--qwWC3uIwaXcGNtT+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 09:03:10PM -0700, Jared Barneck wrote: > David, >=20 > If HP is not really going to support FreeBSD, My understanding of the context of the request was that my correspondent in IT had been asked by someone in HP to help provide a business case for HP to spend more (perhaps in a "Mad Tea Party" sense) resources supporting FreeBSD. > then maybe Dell is a better way to go... My employer already has quite a few HP machines that were purchased with the express intent of running FreeBSD. The decision was not mine. Indeed, I am preparing to start testing an alternative hardware configuration (and vendor). > ... Peace, david --=20 David H. Wolfskill david@catwhisker.org Depriving a girl or boy of an opportunity for education is evil. See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key. --qwWC3uIwaXcGNtT+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkyRmOgACgkQmprOCmdXAD2HggCdHrHdWsq3WXnPZid19RSGja0a b8cAoIRy2KGBBE+bW4+aZOyarkGaaufF =5OkU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --qwWC3uIwaXcGNtT+--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100916041121.GZ1415>