Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 24 Mar 2004 17:57:20 +0100
From:      Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org>
To:        obrien@FreeBSD.org
Cc:        ports-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/libvanessa_adt Makefile pkg-plist ports/devel/libvanessa_adt/files patch-ltmain.sh
Message-ID:  <1080147439.51026.15.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz>
In-Reply-To: <20040324165038.GB3323@dragon.nuxi.com>
References:  <200403231608.i2NG8XmM046696@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040324165038.GB3323@dragon.nuxi.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--=-Kb5xj20aiDiobTTvoyEu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

V st, 24. 03. 2004 v 17:50, David O'Brien p=ED=B9e:

> > > clement     2004/03/23 08:08:33 PST
> > >   FreeBSD ports repository
> > >   Modified files:
> > >     devel/libvanessa_adt Makefile pkg-plist=20
> > >   Added files:
> > >     devel/libvanessa_adt/files patch-ltmain.sh=20
> > >   Log:
> > >   - kill .la files
> > >   - bump PORTREVISION
> ...
> > I object to both of the stated purposes for this commit. First, it's
> > been discussed to death that 1. .la files sometimes serve a useful
> > purpose, and 2. deleting them does not serve a useful purpose. Second,
> > if a user has the port installed already, a bumped PORTREVISION would
> > suggest to them that there is some benefit in deleting the existing por=
t
> > and reinstalling. Here that is clearly not the case.
>=20
> Agreed WRT bumping PORTREVISION.  Why does it seem almost all ports
> committers today think PORTREVISION must be bumped with ever single
> commit??  This does nothing but cause unnecessary great churn when using
> pkg_version and portupgrade.

PORTREVISION should be raised when there's a change (even minor) in the
package. Axing a file from plist is a good reason for PORTREVISION
raise.

--=20
Pav Lucistnik <pav@oook.cz>
              <pav@FreeBSD.org>

Shop at the Mobius Strip Mall: Always on the same side of the street!

--=-Kb5xj20aiDiobTTvoyEu
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Toto je =?iso-8859-2?Q?digit=E1ln=EC?=
	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_podepsan=E1?= =?iso-8859-2?Q?_=E8=E1st?=
	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_zpr=E1vy?=

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQBAYb3vntdYP8FOsoIRAvRPAJ9rwAds2mkBpBAgMIZeWPzJgCEEOgCgl6tZ
zM6skHBd4gG+HWfr9r6qNzg=
=elAa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-Kb5xj20aiDiobTTvoyEu--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1080147439.51026.15.camel>