Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 02:17:48 +0200 From: Alex de Kruijff <freebsd@akruijff.dds.nl> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HT kernel Message-ID: <20041027001748.GA858@alex.lan> In-Reply-To: <20041026210129.GA76812@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <755cb9fc041026135416b35f88@mail.gmail.com> <20041026210129.GA76812@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 02:01:30PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 09:54:45PM +0100, Alexandre Vieira wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I have a machine with an Intel p4 3.2ghz FSB800 w/ 1MB L2 cache and > > I wanted to know your opinion about some kernel options that would > > boost the performance of this kind of processor. > > Note that for a lot of workloads HT decreases performance. In what way? Does HT/SMP kernel or option do worse then a normal kernel or default options? -- Alex Please copy the original recipients, otherwise I may not read your reply.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041027001748.GA858>