Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 13:58:46 +0400 From: "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru> To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: CVSROOT modules Message-ID: <20010823135845.A6196@nagual.pp.ru> In-Reply-To: <xzpbsl7qf0u.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> References: <200108230913.f7N9Dk525008@freefall.freebsd.org> <xzpg0ajqfs1.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20010823134919.B5992@nagual.pp.ru> <xzpbsl7qf0u.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Aug 23, 2001 at 11:52:49 +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru> writes: > > I doubt we can keep 'modules' useful for non-current too, just consider > > movings like many things from sys/miscfs to sys/fs. Current module names > > in that case are unusable for non-current. Or do you mean it must be > > semi-usable excepting movings? > > Please search the archives. You will find that we have always, in the > past, kept modules around after the actual code was removed from > -CURRENT, so people working on older branches could still check out > the module. Ok, I'll restore it, but I not see much sense in this. It will be better to keep two separated versions of modules for -current and non-current. -- Andrey A. Chernov http://ache.pp.ru/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010823135845.A6196>