Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 31 May 2017 14:00:55 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        python@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 219641] devel/py-qt5-core: Fails to package/install, incorrect pk-plist entries
Message-ID:  <bug-219641-21822-bdMwnHCE6P@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-219641-21822@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-219641-21822@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D219641

--- Comment #8 from Dan MacDonald <allcoms@gmail.com> ---
Through having a search, it seems FreeBSD has packages for py34-sip, py36-s=
ip
etc whilst TrueOS only has py27-sip in its repos. You'll have to forgive me=
 as
I'm new to FreeBSD and even newer to using ports but does this matter ie do=
 I
need to request they add py34-sip or py36-sip to the TrueOS repo?=20

I would've thought that building stuff from ports creates packages that are
identical to what you get via pkg, only you have to compile them yourself w=
hich
gives you more scope for tweaking build options etc. Is this not the case? =
Are
ports builds treated differently by the OS compared to packages installed v=
ia
pkg?

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-219641-21822-bdMwnHCE6P>