Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 16:01:10 -0800 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: Thomas Sandford <freebsduser@paradisegreen.co.uk> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RFC: svn for make fetch Message-ID: <4B01E7C6.2060305@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4AFED0D3.2050403@paradisegreen.co.uk> References: <a0777e080911080731w461e6733peb0a5473acf07aa8@mail.gmail.com> <4AF897A4.3070408@delphij.net> <20091109225232.GA34294@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> <a0777e080911092251r3dd39303q4f309aaf4076daf@mail.gmail.com> <4AF9B6CC.5090308@delphij.net> <a0777e080911101228m5a576460g5946c4d1c0923012@mail.gmail.com> <20091113011000.GA45256@atarininja.org> <a0777e080911130000j5c8ffa33r90ad2ac387387c65@mail.gmail.com> <20091113200607.GA59749@atarininja.org> <4AFED0D3.2050403@paradisegreen.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thomas Sandford wrote: > If it were just one port and/or just a port maintainers tool I'd agree. > But this is something that affects MULTIPLE ports. You still seem to be advocating the idea of making this a mechanism for users, in spite of the fact that numerous people have said that idea is not likely to ever be approved. Given the universe where this feature is only used by maintainers, a tool script is a good solution. Doug -- Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with a domain name makeover! http://SupersetSolutions.com/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4B01E7C6.2060305>