Date: Sun, 26 May 2002 23:10:31 -0700 From: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> To: pgreen <polytarp@m-net.arbornet.org> Cc: Rahul Siddharthan <rsidd@online.fr>, chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Language in danger: Language loss Message-ID: <3CF1CDD7.A210BF97@mindspring.com> References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0205261957340.51451-100000@m-net.arbornet.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
pgreen wrote: > Well, you have to think counter-unpartisanly. For example, using > Ruminov's Ruminition, you can think of any idea, regardless of > linguistical barriers. For example, let's say an Episcipitalian wishes to > know how to know. By using Ruminov's Ruminition, he is able to: A) Think, > purely using emotions, a language inate in any human, of the > children. B) This, of course, leads to only one conclusion: 1) Anything > can be known, in the context of one's reality. > > Thus, we see how anything can be thunk, regardeless of any so-called > language. So your hypothesis is that emotions constitute a Turing-complete language? -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3CF1CDD7.A210BF97>