Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2004 08:30:24 -0700 (PDT) From: "Timur I. Bakeyev" <timur@com.bat.ru> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/64523: Make samba-libsmbclient subport of samba-devel Message-ID: <200404071530.i37FUOtN098147@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR ports/64523; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Timur I. Bakeyev" <timur@com.bat.ru> To: Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net>, freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, timur@com.bat.ru Cc: Subject: Re: ports/64523: Make samba-libsmbclient subport of samba-devel Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2004 17:22:49 +0200 On Wed, 7 Apr 2004 15:21:36 +0200 Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> wrote: >There are still issues here: > >1.) samba-devel and samba-libsmbclient still conflict >with each other, which >doesn't make sense. Having a client library installed >must not prevent people >from installing the server. This is quite compleax question, on my opinion. The problem with current approach is that samba-libsmbclient installs the most simplistic version of library, bare bones, I'd say. In a sofisticated environment it should get linked against at least LDAP and Kerberos libraries, to get wide range of ways of authentication. Well, I'm not sure here, would it use them or not... > Instead, samba-devel should >depend on >samba-libsmbclient and never install the library by >itself. My point to keep libsmbclient in samba-devel is the one, mentioned above, plus expences of double compilation of samba tree, which isn't so small. If everyone(who depend on libsmbclient) thinks it's ok, we can get rid of client library from samba-devel. >2.) The slave port has stylebugs (see ports/64393). Hm.. I've looked over the whole PR and didn't find anything, in the slave port, that conflicts with the statements there. Contrary, samba-devel itself has problems with style and doesn't validate by portlint(but thats a separate issue, that involves OPTIONS and structure of bsd.ports.mk). Can you point me, what's wrong with the slave port on your opinion? Oh, and thanks for the patch for samba-devel! With regards, Timur.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200404071530.i37FUOtN098147>