Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 16:08:08 -0500 From: Dan Nelson <dnelson@allantgroup.com> To: "Philip J. Koenig" <pjklist@ekahuna.com> Cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG, Adam Weinberger <monkey@crackula.com>, Ruben de Groot <fbsd-q@bzerk.org> Subject: Re: Sendmail library question/problem Message-ID: <20020612210808.GA73850@dan.emsphone.com> In-Reply-To: <20020612205612975.AAA583@empty1.ekahuna.com@pc02.ekahuna.com> References: <20020612202004.GB56055@dan.emsphone.com> <20020612205612975.AAA583@empty1.ekahuna.com@pc02.ekahuna.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In the last episode (Jun 12), Philip J. Koenig said: > On 12 Jun 2002, at 15:20, Dan Nelson boldly uttered: > > This has been fixed in FreeBSD 4.6. > > I assume you are referring to 4.6-RELEASE (which isn't available yet) > because at least 2 people have encountered this problem with 4.6-RC. Hmm. I'm looking at /usr/src/lib/libmilter/Makefile which hasn't been changed since 2002/03/25, and it sure looks like it installs libmilter and the includes (unless NO_SENDMAIL is set, of course). > > libmilter and its headers are installed; libsm is not required for > > building milters. > > I'm not an expert on this, but all I know is that libsm.a is > specifically referenced in the Makefile for spamass-milter-0.1.1: > > LIBS = /usr/lib/libmilter/libmilter.a /usr/lib/libmilter/libsm.a > > So you're saying that they fixed some problem where it was asking for > libsm.a but it didn't really need it? The author of the Makefile probably just copied from the README in the sendmail source. I have tested my patches on FreeBSD and Debian Linux, and neither need libsm to link. I think it's a typo in the original docs. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020612210808.GA73850>