Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 15:39:32 +0100 From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> To: Chuck Burns <break19@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ABI/architecture identification for packages Message-ID: <20120320143932.GB9629@azathoth.lan> In-Reply-To: <4F687624.9090604@gmail.com> References: <20120319213508.GA1692@azathoth.lan> <20120320091935.GF1692@azathoth.lan> <20120320102008.GH2358@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <CAPJF9wkWFs46mh4BSXjxkyw-c6qV3FiChBC_PLE4Oj-EtKnxig@mail.gmail.com> <4F687624.9090604@gmail.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 07:20:52AM -0500, Chuck Burns wrote: > We should probably pad the version number, and shorten things up.. > similar to: > > package-1.2-fbsd09.1-x86.pkg > package-1.2-fbsd09.1-x64.pkg > package-1.2-fbsd09.1-ppc.pkg > package-1.2-fbsd09.1-ppc64.pkg > package-1.2-fbsd09.1-arm.pkg > > For app "Package" version 1.2, on FreeBSD 9.1 > drop the .1 for .0 versions. > > The reason for the padding is to help with sorting, at least until > freebsd 100.0 comes out. :P > > Chuck Burns > I'm not on changing the package name, this information will be in the manifest. the packagename will remain name-version.txz regards, Bapt [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk9olqQACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EwwvwCdGZzZcAmvMOaPaHOQB4vF0cG3 9vwAn1hM+L4Xp98VqRLFlHyyYbVuWip5 =L5Rf -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120320143932.GB9629>