Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 16:13:07 +0200 From: Ian FREISLICH <ianf@clue.co.za> To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ermal_Lu=E7i?= <eri@freebsd.org> Cc: "freebsd-pf@freebsd.org" <freebsd-pf@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Upgrading FreeBSD to use the NEW pf syntax. Message-ID: <E1TbXWd-0000vf-Mu@clue.co.za> In-Reply-To: <CAPBZQG3SSZorVG5tZ-S6zxs8nW%2Bz7kQX3-J2mSKPOHtbq_kFdQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAPBZQG3SSZorVG5tZ-S6zxs8nW%2Bz7kQX3-J2mSKPOHtbq_kFdQ@mail.gmail.com> <op.wn1vktomjfousr@box.dlink.com> <CAAdA2WPLD7MRLTV6Ah57dxDLwK6qaoPfzmWdFO0m%2B2bAd_Xq2Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAPBZQG2R%2BLXTo8xXZNhfWg%2BS4wtkDc1cAuhoHqdgyiGDGZuXOw@mail.gmail.com> <CAEW%2BogbUkHTaef98=CusV%2BV3qTFHqj-7x-_icKaom_0d2gv69g@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ermal_Lu=E7i?= wrote: > On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Sami Halabi <sodynet1@gmail.com> wrote: > > This was actually discussed much before, as I read it would make some > > issues with the new pf-smp work done by gleb. > > > Not really since Gleb just changed the locking and nothing else. > All his work is under the hood. > > He actually broke if-bound state but that's another story. Do you have more details on this? We use ifbound state in production and I haven't noticed any issues with ifbound state, the way that we use it. There is however an issue with route-to and reply-to when using ifbound state, but that problem existed before Gleb's work. Ian -- Ian Freislich
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E1TbXWd-0000vf-Mu>