Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 17:29:33 -0400 From: Mike Makonnen <mtm@identd.net> To: Mike Makonnen <mtm@identd.net> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Libthr stable enough for testing Message-ID: <20030529212935.ETJF3199.pop016.verizon.net@kokeb.ambesa.net> In-Reply-To: <20030529210716.DVVC25800.out006.verizon.net@kokeb.ambesa.net> References: <20030526225111.HVVN25800.out006.verizon.net@kokeb.ambesa.net> <3ED59893.5010301@isi.edu> <20030529210716.DVVC25800.out006.verizon.net@kokeb.ambesa.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 29 May 2003 17:06:52 -0400
Mike Makonnen <mtm@identd.net> wrote:
> > From what I understand, libthr should be a drop-in replacement for
> > libc_r, so I was surprised to see this, but maybe I misunderstood?
>
> No, you're right. The ports must have been statically linked. I'll
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
scratch that. That's obviously not possible if it's looking for them.
Anyways, I'd appreciate it if you could suply those logs.
> investigate.
Cheers.
--
Mike Makonnen | GPG-KEY: http://www.identd.net/~mtm/mtm.asc
mtm@identd.net | D228 1A6F C64E 120A A1C9 A3AA DAE1 E2AF DBCC 68B9
mtm@FreeBSD.Org| FreeBSD - The Power To Serve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030529212935.ETJF3199.pop016.verizon.net>