Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 00:52:05 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: virtualization@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 237429] bhyve: Performance regression after 12 upgrade Message-ID: <bug-237429-27103-PKAR8ULaHc@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-237429-27103@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-237429-27103@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D237429 amvandemore@gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |amvandemore@gmail.com --- Comment #12 from amvandemore@gmail.com --- I don't think this is a reasonable bug report. Greatly overcommitted resou= rces and configuration like loading ZFS when the system is already memory starve= d.=20=20 I expect the output of something like 'top -aSwd 2' would provide much clar= ity missing from this report. If you do believe this be an actual bug in 12, can you provide the minimal = test case for reproduction. Also can you expand on the CPU errors you are seeing in guest VM's? I susp= ect these are spinlock errors which occur because you are overcommited, not bec= ause you are running 12-STABLE. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-237429-27103-PKAR8ULaHc>