Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 00:52:05 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: virtualization@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 237429] bhyve: Performance regression after 12 upgrade Message-ID: <bug-237429-27103-PKAR8ULaHc@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-237429-27103@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-237429-27103@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237429 amvandemore@gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |amvandemore@gmail.com --- Comment #12 from amvandemore@gmail.com --- I don't think this is a reasonable bug report. Greatly overcommitted resources and configuration like loading ZFS when the system is already memory starved. I expect the output of something like 'top -aSwd 2' would provide much clarity missing from this report. If you do believe this be an actual bug in 12, can you provide the minimal test case for reproduction. Also can you expand on the CPU errors you are seeing in guest VM's? I suspect these are spinlock errors which occur because you are overcommited, not because you are running 12-STABLE. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-237429-27103-PKAR8ULaHc>