Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 5 Jul 2019 12:22:43 -0500
From:      "J. Hellenthal" <jhellenthal@dataix.net>
To:        Walter Cramer <wfc@mintsol.com>
Cc:        freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: ?Minor Security Issue - DNS, /etc/hosts, freebsd-update, ?pkg
Message-ID:  <20190705172243.D0A7B4C710E0@DataIX.net>
In-Reply-To: <20190704093847.U44480@mulder.mintsol.com>
References:  <20190703004928.525251A7DC@freefall.freebsd.org> <20190704093847.U44480@mulder.mintsol.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--mxktcol6gdwwqprk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


And in what revision besides an administrators local modifications
suggest that those werre ever a part of the source trree ?


For reference ...
https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/stable/11/etc/hosts?view=3Dlog


Quite frankly the FreeBSD source committers are much more knowledged
thann your insight suggests...

Facts plz ...



On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 10:18:16AM -0400, Walter Cramer wrote:
> Suspected severity:  Low.  Systems with inattentive administrators may not
> receive the latest updates, and no obvious error messages will point out =
the
> problem.
>=20
> Situation discovered in:  A few older 11.2-RELEASE FreeBSD systems, with
> /etc/hosts entries like this:
>=20
> 96.47.72.72	ftp.freebsd.org
> 96.47.72.71	pkg.freebsd.org
>=20
> (Those are now obsolete.  Originally, they were added to simplify firewall
> rules and rule-loading, and as a DNS hijack defense.)
>=20
> Resulting problem:  `freebsd-update fetch` sometimes "sees" the latest
> (11.2-RELEASE-p11) version of 11.2.  Other times, it "sees" the older
> 11.2-RELEASE-p10.  So, if a sysadmin relied on `freebsd-update` to tell h=
im
> when systems needed updating, he could be unaware of un-patched, vulnerab=
le
> systems.
>=20
> NOT verified:  Whether the obsolete /etc/hosts entry for pkg.freebsd.org
> actually causes any problems.  (Or if `pkg` is aware of the problem, and
> silently doing all the right things.)
>=20
> Suggested Fixes...
>  - Have `freebsd-update`, `pkg`, and similar utilities double-check for D=
NS
> information that is obsolete or conflicting, and warn the user.
>  - Have any obsolete - but still-active - pkg or update servers advertise
> their obsolete status, and `freebsd-update` and `pkg` notice that, and wa=
rn
> the user.
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@freebsd.or=
g"

--=20
The fact that there's a Highway to Hell but only a Stairway to Heaven says =
a lot about anticipated traffic volume.

--mxktcol6gdwwqprk
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQFUBAEBCAA+FiEEeBtiLAqm/fi0bzsxMu77BFzgpwgFAl0fh2MgFIAAAAAAFgAB
amhlbGxlbnRoYWxARGF0YUlYLm5ldCEACgkQMu77BFzgpwgmdAgAjellRpzCVpr9
CQug8uBqaiIJBmVTpyS218R7e80aPcjLy9y+2Lbf10a7v+xh93WOE1B5krfFrA/3
/d16xlUxMnqDXUVhyZiD7ao5sA1AG8KZ1bCAMNAF5zjcOZq4KCVyqCL77nk+ILgo
r9YEDZkHiptOwGhXS0KewtlX8dumIm6LluvbQL86iLup6ZHA/h6qQD+2fa9Lspw9
l57yhxEzhA6M94J5JAWUd63Y0Ewes1N0kd1ASgVNjuReuTTs+LsICq/lVOAxYEJE
1ArwASAWOQ56xawzahPSFV8XJcrSuLPpbdpnbxnLjcasnNbgOSWZU2WL8katMnGb
JhE62010+Q==
=5uTD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--mxktcol6gdwwqprk--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20190705172243.D0A7B4C710E0>