Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 17:06:08 -0700 From: Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org> To: Andrzej Bialecki <abial@webgiro.com> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>, Valentin Nechayev <netch@lucky.net>, Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: dynamic vs static sysctls? Message-ID: <200102010006.f11068926954@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 31 Jan 2001 10:25:39 %2B0100." <Pine.BSF.4.20.0101311021320.52835-100000@mx.webgiro.com> References: <Pine.BSF.4.20.0101311021320.52835-100000@mx.webgiro.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <Pine.BSF.4.20.0101311021320.52835-100000@mx.webgiro.com> Andrzej Bialecki writes: : changed to create the subtree on the fly, based on the actual presence of : the hardware: : : hw.atamode.ata0: --- : hw.atamode.ata1: --- : hw.atamode.ata2: dma : hw.atamode.ata3: dma : ... The problem with this scheme is that you don't have all the information about a device under one part of the treem. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200102010006.f11068926954>