Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2000 15:48:41 -0500 From: "Pedro F. Giffuni" <giffunip@asme.org> To: Gustavo V G C Rios <kernel@tdnet.com.br> Cc: freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Is traditional unixes kernel really stable ? Message-ID: <38EE49A9.FD59F18@asme.org> References: <38ED128C.22C3AA28@tdnet.com.br> <20000406192206.N22104@fw.wintelcom.net> <38ED233E.74716D02@tdnet.com.br> <20000406230234.B4381@fw.wintelcom.net> <38EDD209.421EF9B0@tdnet.com.br> <38EE0536.F2305A40@quack.kfu.com> <38EDDBC4.51F2414D@tdnet.com.br>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
(Moved to chat)
Gustavo V G C Rios wrote:
>
...
> If microkernel has such a drawnbacks, why QNX is so fast and reliable?
> Should you download it too, and realize what i mean.
>
Don't believe everything you read...the world is full of people that
love to prove others are wrong :-).
...
> Thanks a lot for the patience.
>
> PS: I am just a beginner, so, don't take me wrong. The fact is that i am
> really confused about what books say about microkernel and what in that
> single demo floppy. I would be really glad to have some here to kindly
> clarify it to me.
>
There's always room for more confusion; read something about Exokernels
now :-).
FWIW, I think we are pretty much married with the monolithic kernel plus
some flexible tools/techniques like kld's and stacking fs to get over
the known problems.
cheers,
Pedro.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?38EE49A9.FD59F18>