Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 14:53:37 +0100 From: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za> To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Nate Williams <nate@yogotech.com>, Mark Murray <markm@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/gnu/usr.bin/perl Makefile Makefile.inc src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/utils Makefile.inc Message-ID: <200109211353.f8LDrbV02285@grimreaper.grondar.za> In-Reply-To: <20010920203159.A66160@sunbay.com> ; from Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> "Thu, 20 Sep 2001 20:31:59 %2B0300." References: <20010920203159.A66160@sunbay.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > Err, ``make depend all'' is not guaranteed to work at all.
> >
> > It should work, but it won't use the dependencies created in the .depend
> > file. For any 'from-scratch' builds, this should be fine.
> >
> Yes, but that's the exact problem that was tried to be solved AFAICS.
> Otherwise, why Mark wrote ``make depend all'' and not ``make all''?
> Of course, ``make obj && make all'' should work. Only in rare cases
> ``make depend'' is required for fresh builds, when the depend target
> is abused (or {before|after}depend).
You guys are reading waaaaay too much into my words.
"make depend all" is what I often type - I also type "make depend && make all".
Both are tested, both work. "make all" also works.
Pink. Definitely pink.
M
--
o Mark Murray
\_ FreeBSD Services Limited
O.\_ Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200109211353.f8LDrbV02285>