Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 22:36:30 +0400 From: Yar Tikhiy <yar@comp.chem.msu.su> To: Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org> Cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libc/gen fts-compat.c fts-compat.h Message-ID: <20070824183630.GA99474@comp.chem.msu.su> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0708241057010.12450@sea.ntplx.net> References: <200708230509.l7N59VCi048341@repoman.freebsd.org> <Pine.GSO.4.64.0708241057010.12450@sea.ntplx.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 11:03:12AM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote: > On Thu, 23 Aug 2007, Yar Tikhiy wrote: > > >yar 2007-08-23 05:09:31 UTC > > > > FreeBSD src repository > > > > Modified files: > > lib/libc/gen fts-compat.c fts-compat.h > > Log: > > Forced commit to note repo-copy: > > > > These files have been repo-copied from src/include/fts.h > > and src/lib/libc/gen/fts.c to serve as a base for 4.4BSD > > compatible versions of fts(3) functions to be preserved > > through libc symbol versioning while the default versions > > undergo ABI-breaking extension to support big file trees. > > When are you going to break the ABI? After 7.0 is tagged > and released? If you break the ABI before, you don't need > or want to have the compat versions; the libraries have already > been bumped in prep for release. I don't think we want to > use symbol versioning as a crutch for -current users; the > version definitions are meant for public releases only. The reason for exercising symbol versions right now is that "make installworld" is sensitive to the fts(3) ABI. If the ABI is just broken w/o special measures, "make installworld" will fail in the middle and leave you with a botched system. It goes as follows: - "make installworld" copies the old /usr/bin/find and some other tools to /tmp/install.xxx for use during the install - libc is overwritten by its new instance, with new fts(3) ABI - the old find(1) is run by installworld and dumps core immediately. Earlier the problem was to be avoided by bumping libc version so that the old libc is kept, and now I chose symbol versioning to get around it. Do you think there is a different way? -- Yar
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070824183630.GA99474>