Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 13:55:28 +1100 From: Peter Ross <Peter.Ross@bogen.in-berlin.de> To: Garrett Cooper <yanefbsd@gmail.com> Cc: Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy@optushome.com.au>, Eitan Adler <eitanadlerlist@gmail.com>, "Pedro F. Giffuni" <giffunip@tutopia.com>, "O. Hartmann" <ohartman@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Alternatives to gcc (was Re: gcc 4.3: when will it become standard compiler?) Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0901121331380.1299@klein.bigpond.com> In-Reply-To: <7d6fde3d0901111813y3da92325p6d2a3541d7db53a2@mail.gmail.com> References: <61484.71762.qm@web32708.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <20090111044448.GC5661@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <4969CC6D.6030707@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> <496A8F45.7010400@gmail.com> <7d6fde3d0901111813y3da92325p6d2a3541d7db53a2@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 11 Jan 2009, Garrett Cooper wrote: > Definitely look up the terms of the LGPL and GPL and compare and > contrast those licenses versus the BSD, MIT, and Apache licenses. You > might be surprised... Probably more interesting are comparisons between GPL v2 and v3 and concerns voiced by Linux developers. E.g. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_General_Public_License and http://lwn.net/Articles/200422/. I am not a lawyer .. I have an opinion but it is probably better to leave comments to people with better understanding of legal issues. Regards Peter
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.0901121331380.1299>