Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 09:22:17 +0100 From: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> To: Svyatoslav Lempert <svyatoslav.lempert@gmail.com> Cc: emulation@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: linux_base-f10-10_4 Message-ID: <20120310092217.00007cfc@unknown> In-Reply-To: <CAERaTk9Ck4infypMnWuKWGU9rgmBwJqhv4tTv2yOBJP1NaztfA@mail.gmail.com> References: <1331226987.9802.19.camel@work> <20120309134425.Horde.RIrSbJjmRSRPWfspeJi2piA@webmail.leidinger.net> <20120309134433.GX23354@e-new.0x20.net> <20120309153952.Horde.n8gTQpjmRSRPWhY4YaaoHcA@webmail.leidinger.net> <CAERaTk9Ck4infypMnWuKWGU9rgmBwJqhv4tTv2yOBJP1NaztfA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 15:41:23 +0900 Svyatoslav Lempert <svyatoslav.lempert@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > eagle: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.10' not found (required > >>> > by eagle) > >>> > > >>> > I can run version 5.1 in the meantime. But it looks like I will > >>> > need an updated version of linux_base-f10, perhaps an f11, f12 > >>> > or f13 or f14 version. > >>> > > >>> > Are there plans to update linux_base-f10 sometime this year ? > >>> > >>> Those which have the knowledge to produce a more recent linux_base > >>> port, don't seem to have the time to do this. Those which tell to > >>> have time and express interest to do this, seem to lose interest > >>> or time when they get get aware of what needs to be done (see > >>> > > We can not run last Fedora 16 on FreeBSD - this is not possible, > because Linux emulation is kernel 2.6.16 and Fedora needs in > 2.6.32 > kernel ABI. Thanks for the info. > I try this in FreeBSD 8.2 (I did a "draft of the port") > > # ./bash > FATAL: kernel too old > > # file bash > bash: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (GNU/Linux), > dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.6.32, stripped > > # sysctl compat.linux.osrelease=2.6.32 > compat.linux.osrelease: 2.6.16 -> 2.6.32 > > # ./bash > Segmentation fault Can you please ktrace it and use linux_kdump to have a look what is the most likely cause of this? It would be good to know what's missing in the kernel. > I think it should be apply to the CoreTeam I don't understand what you want to tell. If you talk about core@, they are not involved in the linuxulator (like most other committers). > What do you think about the CentOS? It may be more optimal to look on > CentOS 6 userland port? Any long-term release looks better than what we have now. A RPM based one (like CentOS) looks more easy to port because of the existing RPM infrastructure, than any non-RPM based one. If someone would give CentOS a quick try, emulation@ would be interested to know if the linux programs run on FreeBSD or not. Bye, Alexander. -- http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID = 72077137
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120310092217.00007cfc>