Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 12:51:01 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Cc: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: -isoC (was: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libc/stdio printf.3) Message-ID: <20010614125101.C76663@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0106141837370.74348-100000@besplex.bde.org>; from bde@zeta.org.au on Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 06:55:36PM %2B1000 References: <20010614094304.D50901@sunbay.com> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0106141837370.74348-100000@besplex.bde.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 06:55:36PM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote: > > Here's the list of C standards in mdoc(7): > > > > : ANSI/ISO C > > : > > : -ansiC ANSI X3.159-1989 (``ANSI C'') > > : -ansiC-89 ANSI X3.159-1989 (``ANSI C'') > > : -isoC ISO/IEC 9899:1990 (``ISO C89'') > > : -isoC-99 ISO/IEC 9899:1999 (``ISO C99'') > > I think this is POSIX-speak (except for X3.159-1989 of course). > "ISO C89" makes no sense for a 1990 standard. *sigh* we all know that the 1999 ISO standard is identical to the 1989 ANSI standard (minus the Rationale and a renumbering). What most people want to call ISO/C90 should really be ISO/C94 (or when ever the last addendum to ISO/IEC 9899:1990 was ratified). To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010614125101.C76663>