Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 20:46:44 -0800 From: "Sam Leffler" <sam@errno.com> To: "Hiten Pandya" <hiten@unixdaemons.com>, "Darren Reed" <darrenr@reed.wattle.id.au> Cc: "Hiten Pandya" <hiten@unixdaemons.com>, <current@FreeBSD.ORG>, <darrenr@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: PFIL_HOOKS should be made default in 5.0 Message-ID: <0e9701c2a7e2$cbe1de20$52557f42@errno.com> References: <0a6201c2a6f9$42cfd720$52557f42@errno.com> <200212200127.MAA20942@avalon.reed.wattle.id.au> <20021220032930.GA67469@unixdaemons.com> <0e5401c2a7e1$37149090$52557f42@errno.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Maybe we should put in the release notes, that:
> >
> > "PFIL_HOOKS is required for IPFILTER"
>
> The right thing is to force the dependency in the code (I don't think
> there's a way to express it to config). The ipfilter code should probably
> have something like
>
> #ifndef PFIL_HOOKS
> #error "You must specify PFIL_HOOKS when using ipfilter"
> #endif
>
> Unfortunately there's no way that I know to express this if ipfilter is
> loaded as a module.
Duh, there'll probably be unresolved symbols if you try to load ipl.ko w/o
PFIL_HOOKS defined in the kernel.
Sam
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?0e9701c2a7e2$cbe1de20$52557f42>