Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 14:14:30 -0600 From: "Jeremy Messenger" <mezz7@cox.net> To: "Mike Jakubik" <mikej@rogers.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Portsnap is now in the base system Message-ID: <op.s3hmigpj9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com> In-Reply-To: <43CBEEF4.1000007@rogers.com> References: <42F871B4.6000703@freebsd.org> <200601161324.57292.nike_d@cytexbg.com> <43CB8E90.8090902@suutari.iki.fi> <20060116175526.GA25023@lizzy.catnook.local> <43CBEEF4.1000007@rogers.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 13:07:32 -0600, Mike Jakubik <mikej@rogers.com> wrote: > Jos Backus wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 02:16:16PM +0200, Ari Suutari wrote: >> >>>> On Tuesday 09 August 2005 12:04, Colin Percival wrote: >>>> >>>>> About 12 hours ago I committed portsnap to HEAD. From the commit >>>>> log: >>>>> >>>>> Add portsnap to the base system. This is a secure, easy to use, >>>>> fast, lightweight, and generally good way for users to keep their >>>>> ports trees up to date. >>>>> >>>>> >>> Is there an utility (cvsup-replacement) like this for base system >>> sources ? >>> >> >> See csup: http://mu.org/~mux/csup.html. But it's not ready yet. > > Why would one want to replace cvsup? It works great! You won't be asking that kind of question if you read there in the second paragraph. ;-) Cheers, Mezz -- mezz7@cox.net - mezz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD GNOME Team http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome@FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?op.s3hmigpj9aq2h7>