Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 02:44:30 -0500 (CDT) From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> To: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: Fixing -pthreads (Re: ports and -current) Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0309210241270.27516-100000@pancho> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10309210134060.26520-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I don't think committing fixes for -current breakages should cause > problems for 4.9-RELEASE (especially with the caveat that they be > compile tested on -stable). It takes several days to do the compile QA. That's assuming that no actual users are allowed to have time to test the changes before the release is cut. IMHO, what you think just doesn't reflect the actual reality involved. We are just going to have to disagree on this. You should really look at the bento logs and get an understanding of the continual QA that is done on the _over_ 9000 ports (many of which have _no_ maintainer signed up) before you make assumptions that there shouldn't be significant problems with what you propose. mcl
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.44.0309210241270.27516-100000>