Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 14:52:34 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> Cc: alpha@freebsd.org, Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org> Subject: Re: (forw) per-arch __P removal done, please test review. Message-ID: <20020320145234.A87429@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <3C99095A.8C598A76@mindspring.com>; from tlambert2@mindspring.com on Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 02:12:42PM -0800 References: <20020320181508.GG455@elvis.mu.org> <20020320101950.A65314@dragon.nuxi.com> <3C99095A.8C598A76@mindspring.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 02:12:42PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote: > > PLEASE no one commit Alfred's patch. It will conflict badly with my > > effort here -- which is even being compiled tested. > > Actually, shouldn't it be identical? No. Mine was tested on the GENERIC kernel build, and there was two cases where the sed invocation did the wrong thing. > If it's going to be done, then Just Do It. It's not like it > takes a PhD to remove __P(), or one to understand code where > it's at, for that matter. It just doesn't seem that big a > deal... it's a lot of unpleasent grunt work. IT DOES however, need to be compiled tested before committing. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the messagehelp
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020320145234.A87429>