Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 25 Jan 2010 19:19:59 -0700 (MST)
From:      "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
To:        rrs@lakerest.net
Cc:        attilio@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-mips@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: AR71XX RTC
Message-ID:  <20100125.191959.956847443352467531.imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <74D48EE5-544E-44D4-9644-2349E9AA9796@lakerest.net>
References:  <489828.45501.qm@web34403.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <74D48EE5-544E-44D4-9644-2349E9AA9796@lakerest.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <74D48EE5-544E-44D4-9644-2349E9AA9796@lakerest.net>
            Randall Stewart <rrs@lakerest.net> writes:
: Thanks that makes a LOT of sense.. So basically the
: mtx passed is NOT what is currently in td_lock and we
: want it updated as we switch.

Yes.

I think there still might be a bit of oddness here and there, since
the cavium port has a weird access to sysctl issue when a rm_lock is
involved.  I'm not at all sure why that would be...  It may be
scheduling related, but it may also just be some minor init the cavium
is doing that's just a bit off...

Warner





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100125.191959.956847443352467531.imp>