Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 10:16:42 +0200 From: Damjan Marion <dmarion@FreeBSD.org> To: Tim Kientzle <kientzle@freebsd.org> Cc: arm@freebsd.org, Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>, freebsd-current FreeBSD <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Customizing ubldr build... Message-ID: <B9008F20-E417-48BC-AAAC-8111A39B0A8B@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <EBC5FF24-B1F5-43CD-AB1C-3BB659E8F5C6@freebsd.org> References: <E84EA543-11A9-4EA6-9313-6908F485C569@freebsd.org> <CAJ-VmomyYPzqEJ86a6tfKSDeYrBqD21UDjefqyFNZC4yJ-pLWA@mail.gmail.com> <EBC5FF24-B1F5-43CD-AB1C-3BB659E8F5C6@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On May 24, 2012, at 6:35 AM, Tim Kientzle wrote: > I think the PandaBoard ES is fully supported by U-Boot, > so it should be possible to use ubldr as part of the boot > chain for that just like I've been doing with BeagleBone. What are the benefits of using ubldr compared to what we are doing = today(load; go)? Damjan=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?B9008F20-E417-48BC-AAAC-8111A39B0A8B>