Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 16:39:46 -0300 From: "JP Villa (Datafull.com)" <root@datafull.com> To: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG, Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re[2]: openssh OR openssh-portable Message-ID: <41256714305.20020627163946@datafull.com> In-Reply-To: <xzp6604x5ue.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> References: <3D1AD7C4.9020909@cerint.pl> <xzp6604x5ue.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Taking a look at the handbook, it's pretty clear that -STABLE is not an option for production boxes. Personally, I prefer to stick with RELENG_4_6 because of this. Then, the question is: What do I have to do with OpenSSH? (don't tell me 2.9, I want the latest codebase possible) The platform integration is not an issue for me right now, as I just want the basic functionality and get some good sleep. I think the original question was pointing to this too, so I rephrase: openssh or openssh-portable? or maybe openssh 3.4 properly merged on a production codebase? and in that case, when? Best regards, Juan Pablo Villa DATAFULL.COM Sysadmin Cuatro Cabezas S.A. Buenos Aires, Argentina Thursday, June 27, 2002, 9:29:29 AM, you wrote: DES> Marcin Gryszkalis <mgryszkalis@cerint.pl> writes: >> Which port should I use (I'm migrating from -stable basesystem ssh) DES> Neither. Calm down and wait for 3.4p1 to hit -STABLE. DES> DES To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?41256714305.20020627163946>