Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 10 Nov 2015 10:56:01 +0000
From:      Bob Bishop <rb@gid.co.uk>
To:        =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no>
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: OpenSSH HPN
Message-ID:  <261DDEE0-B792-4715-A8EF-27E491122BD2@gid.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <86io5a9ome.fsf@desk.des.no>
References:  <86io5a9ome.fsf@desk.des.no>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

Hi,

> On 10 Nov 2015, at 09:42, Dag-Erling Smørgrav <des@des.no> wrote:
> 
> […]
> 
> Therefore, I would like to remove the HPN patches from base and refer
> anyone who really needs them to the openssh-portable port, which has
> them as a default option.  I would also like to remove the NONE cipher
> patch, which is also available in the port (off by default, just like in
> base).

Can’t argue with that. Is removing HPN going to impact the performance of tunnelled X connexions?


> DES
> -- 
> Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des@des.no
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"

--
Bob Bishop
rb@gid.co.uk







Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?261DDEE0-B792-4715-A8EF-27E491122BD2>