Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 17 Jun 2014 15:14:40 -0700
From:      "Simon J. Gerraty" <sjg@juniper.net>
To:        Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@FreeBSD.org>, Brooks Davis <brooks@FreeBSD.org>, Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>, freebsd-current Current <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   Re: Problems building FreeBSD 9.2 on FreeBSD 10
Message-ID:  <20140617221440.99644580A1@chaos.localdomain>
In-Reply-To: <CAG=rPVeBgWS=vMGxSmX8O4QWW77XC2mqDgaiNrFsGrzg47UQYQ@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <CAG=rPVct-HzOksM2KQvPuOdf4zgZo__=Oannh0x%2B_JVHEzQyyw@mail.gmail.com> <CAG=rPVfkGa7=n-TSqcnP574ry0Au2THbqvAZJfKD5OK9a1FBNw@mail.gmail.com> <20140617200551.07542580A1@chaos.localdomain> <CAG=rPVeBgWS=vMGxSmX8O4QWW77XC2mqDgaiNrFsGrzg47UQYQ@mail.gmail.com>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail

>> Why not use fmake in that scenario?
>
>That might work.   Is using the devel/fmake port sufficient for using fmake?

So long as it is recent enough to have :tu and :tl I would expect so.

>If I typed "make something", is there a way inside the make environment to
>detect if bmake or fmake was invoked, and error out appropriately?

You can test for bmake with

.if defined(.PARSEDIR)

lack of that means fmake.


home | help

Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140617221440.99644580A1>