Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 22 May 2004 02:30:09 -0700
From:      Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@icir.org>
To:        Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Disk performance under CURRENT
Message-ID:  <20040522023009.A55780@xorpc.icir.org>
In-Reply-To: <45922.1085211971@critter.freebsd.dk>; from phk@phk.freebsd.dk on Sat, May 22, 2004 at 09:46:11AM %2B0200
References:  <20040521224729.680285D0A@ptavv.es.net> <45922.1085211971@critter.freebsd.dk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, May 22, 2004 at 09:46:11AM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
...
> GEOM is slower than 4-stable in a degenerate case like this, but it
> sounds to me like there is something else involved here too.  Have

indeed. i seem to remember running a dd to disk a nd
getting similar (~55MB/s) numbers on both 4.x and 5.2.1
(athlon xp2200+ and a maxtor 160GB disk)

cheers
luigi

> you removed WITNESS from your kernel ?
> 
> -- 
> Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
> phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
> FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
> Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040522023009.A55780>