Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 14:18:54 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> To: "Donald J. O'Neill" <donaldj1066@fastmail.fm> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Portupgrade -af question Message-ID: <20041027211854.GD59489@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <200410271607.45661.donaldj1066@fastmail.fm> References: <BAY2-DAV3ExvWvqzAoa0000c9e7@hotmail.com> <20041027190416.GA70873@ei.bzerk.org> <BAY2-DAV9tPGtPrPrvC000146aa@hotmail.com> <200410271607.45661.donaldj1066@fastmail.fm>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 04:07:45PM -0500, Donald J. O'Neill wrote: > I'm also curious as to why you just do not use /etc/libmap.conf, > instead of rebuilding all installed packages, that would be even > faster. Its a hack that people forget about and later get bitten by it. Kris Kennaway has just recently built new packages for 5-stable and 6-current. There is no reason not to just use those (portupgrade -PP) and get any library issues dealt with properly. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041027211854.GD59489>